For the 288,751 species in the Class Liliopsida (Monocotyledons), we average 3.97 observations each in our database; for the Smallflower Umbrella Sedge, we have 363 observations. Compared to other species in this Class, this species is moderately common.
A two-sample t-test can be used to determine whether the trend in observations of the Smallflower Umbrella Sedge is the same as the trend in observations of Liliopsida. Is this species just as common, as a proportion of all observations, as it once was? The answer is no, changes in observation rate of this species significantly differ from changes in observation rate of its Class. (t=6.439, p<0.001)
How do observation rates of the Smallflower Umbrella Sedge differ from those of Liliopsida? To answer this, we examined the percentage of observerations for Liliopsida that were observations of the Smallflower Umbrella Sedge each year. We then correlated this percentage with observation year. If observations of the Smallflower Umbrella Sedge are becoming more common relative to other species of Liliopsida, the correlation should be positive, but if it is becoming less common, the correlation should be negative. In fact, the correlation is negative (r=-.44), with a negative slope (m = -.001), suggesting that the Smallflower Umbrella Sedge may be in decline relative to other species of Liliopsida. This correlation is statistically significant. (F = 90.37, p<.05)
The scatter chart to the right shows the percentage of all observations for Liliopsida each year that were observations of the Smallflower Umbrella Sedge.
Genus:Cyperus
(sy-PEER-us)
Linnaeus, Sp. Pl. 1: 44. 1753; Gen. Pl. ed. 5, 26. 1754. - Umbrella-sedge, flatsedge [Greek kupeiros, name for Eurasian Cyperus longus Linnaeus]
Specific epithet:difformis L.
Botanical name:Cyperus difformis L.
Notes:
Name Status: Accepted Name. Latest taxonomic scrutiny: 15-Mar-2000
Place of publication: Cent. pl. II:6. 1756 (Amoen. acad. 4:302. 1759)
Name verified on 19-Jan-2001 by ARS Systematic Botanists. Last updated: 25-Mar-2003
Herbs, annual or perennial, cespitose or not, rhizomatous or not, stoloniferous or not. Rootsfibrous, principally adventitious.Stems (culms) usually trigonous, occasionally terete, rarely compressed, usually solid, rarely hollow or septate. Leaves basal and/or cauline, alternate, usually 3-ranked, rarely 2-ranked or multi-ranked, bases forming cylindricsheaths enclosing stem, margins usually fused; junction of sheaths and blades often with adaxial flaps of tissue or fringes of hair (ligules) ; blades frequently absent from some basal leaves, rarely from cauline leaves, when present divergent or ascending, flat, folded, plicate, rolled, or terete, linear, venation parallel. Primaryinflorescences (spikelets) a shortened axis; glumaceousbracts (scales) 1-many, spirally arranged, sometimes 2-ranked, usually appressed or ascending; scales usually all fertile, each subtending a single flower, sometimes proximal and/or distal scales empty; lateralspikes often with basal, usually empty, usually 2-keeled scale (prophyll) ; occasionally prophyll subtending and enclosing rachilla, bearing 1 pistillate, sometimes (0-) 3 staminate flowers and empty scales (Carex, Cymophyllus, and Kobresia) . Secondary inflorescences panicles, often modified to corymb, pseudoumbel, cyme (anthela), raceme, spike, or capitulum (head), rarely single spike, usually subtended by foliaceous or, less frequently, glumaceous bracts; secondary inflorescences sometimes simulating spikelets (Carex, Cymophyllus, and Kobresia) . Flowers hypogynous, bisexual in most genera, unisexual in Scleria, Carex, Cymophyllus, and Kobresia; perianth absent or with (1-) 3-6(-30) bristles and/or scales, usually falling off with fruit; stamens usually (1-) 3, rarely more, usually distinct; anthersbasifixed; pistils 1, 2-3(-4) -carpellate, fused, locule 1; style undivided or branches 2-3(-4) ; stigma sometimes papillate.Fruitsachenes, usually trigonous or biconvex; pericarps thin (except in Scleria) . Seeds 1; testa thin, free from pericarp; embryo basal; endosperm abundant. x = 5-ca. 100.
Genera ca. 100, species ca. 5000 (27 genera, 843 species in the flora) : worldwide.
No consensus exists regarding the number of genera and the overall relationships of genera within Cyperaceae. The most recent account of the family (P. Goetghebeur 1998) recognized 104 genera distributed among 4 subfamilies and 14 tribes. That arrangement differs somewhat from that of J. Bruhl (1995) . With one minor exception the arrangement of the family here follows that of Goetghebeur.
The family is characterized by the occurrence of a number of unusual cytological features including: (1) chromosomes with diffusecentromeres, (2) post-reductional meiosis, and (3) pollen grains formed from tetrads in which 3 of the 4 microspores fail to develop. The first two features are found in at least some Juncaceae and are unique to the two families. Juncaceae also have pollen in tetrads, but in that family all four microspores produce pollen grains. Some species in some genera of Cyperaceae (particularly Eleocharis) possess chromosomes with localized centromeres (S. S. Bir et al. 1993) . The wide range of chromosome numbers found in Cyperaceae is largely because of agmatoploidy; polyploidy has been hypothesized for some genera, especially Eleocharis, although polyploidy has not been demonstrated unequivocally.
Because of morphologic similarities in vegetative and inflorescencecharacters, the family has commonly been associated with Poaceae. Cytological features discussed above clearly indicate that to be a superficial similarity.Data from rbcL studies also support the view that Cyperaceae and Poaceae are not closely related (M.R. Duvall et al. 1993b; G. M. Plunkett et al. 1995) ; they do support the concept of close relationship between Cyperaceae and Juncaceae.
For most families of flowering plants the phenological data given are flowering times. Because most Cyperaceae cannot be reliably identified when in flower, in this volume fruiting time is given for all species by season, sometimes qualified by early, mid, or late, or by months. The fruiting time has been interpreted broadly to include the period when the fruit is more or less fully formed but not yet ripe. The fruiting period provided covers the entire range of the taxon. Quite a difference between fruiting periods in different parts of the range of the species may well occur, especially for widespread species and species with extensive elevation
range.
For a recent, comprehensive review of the economic importance of Cyperaceae, see D. A. Simpson and C. A. Inglis (2001) .[1]
Genus Cyperus:
Herbs, perennial or less often annual, cespitose or not, rhizomatous, stoloniferous, rarely tuberous.Culms solitary or not, trigonous or round, glabrous or scabridulous with extrorse or antrorse (rarely retrorse) prickles. Leaves usually basal; ligules absent; bladeskeeledabaxially, flat, V-, or inversely W-shaped in crosssection. Inflorescences terminal, rarely pseudolateral, 1st order subumbellate to capitate, 2d order with spicate or digitately arranged spikelets, rarely a solitary spikelet; spikelets 1-150; 1st order rays unequal (rarely equal) in length, produced
singly from the axils of inflorescence bracts; involucral bracts 1-22, spirally arranged at culmapex, spreading to erect, leaflike. Spikelets: scales to 76, distichous, each subtendingflower, cylindric to compressed, borne spicately or digitately at ends of rays (occasionally proliferous) . Flowersbisexual [rarely unisexual], in axils of distichous floral scales, bases often decurrent onto rachilla as ± hyalinewings; perianth absent; stamens 1-3; styleslinear, 2-3-fid, basedeciduous or persistent; stigmas 2-3. Achenesbiconvex, flattened, or trigonous.
Boggan, J. et al. 1997. Checklist of the plants of the Guianas, ed. 2. (L Guianas ed2)
Boulos, L. 1995. Flora of Egypt checklist. (L Egypt)
Brako, L. & J. L. Zarucchi. 1993. Catalogue of the flowering plants and gymnosperms of Peru. Monogr. Syst. Bot. Missouri Bot. Gard. 45. (L Peru)
Bruhl, J. 1995. Sedge genera of the world: Relationships and a new classification of the Cyperaceae. Austral. Syst. Bot. 8: 125-305.
Carter, J. R. 1984. A Systematic Study of the New World Species of Section Umbellati of Cyperus. Ph.D. dissertation. Vanderbilt University.
Chinese Academy of Sciences. 1959–. Flora reipublicae popularis sinicae. (F China)
Corcoran, M. L. 1941. A revision of the subgenus Pycreus in North and South America. Catholic Univ. Amer., Biol. Ser. 37: 168.
Dassanayake, M. D. & F. R. Fosberg, eds. 1980–. A revised handbook to the flora of Ceylon. (F Ceylon)
Davidse, G. et al., eds. 1994. Flora mesoamericana. (F Mesoamer)
Denton, M. F. 1978b. The Luzulae group of Cyperus (Cyperaceae). Contr. Univ. Michigan Herb. 11: 197271.
Foreman, D. B. & N. G. Walsh. 1993–. Flora of Victoria. (F Victoria)
Germishuizen, G. & N. L. Meyer, eds. 2003. Plants of southern Africa: an annotated checklist. Strelitzia 14. (Pl SAfr ed2)
Ghazanfar, S. A. 1992. An annotated catalogue of the vascular plants of Oman. Scripta Botanica Belgica 2. (L Oman)
Goetghebeur, P. 1998. Cyperaceae. In: K. Kubitzki et al., eds. 1990+. The Families and Genera of Vascular Plants. 4+ vols. Berlin etc. Vol. 4, pp. 141-190.
Gordon-Gray, K. D. 1995. Cyperaceae in Natal. (Cyper Natal) 56.
Grierson, A. J. C. & D. J. Long. 1984–. Flora of Bhutan including a record of plants from Sikkim. (F Bhutan)
Haines, R. W. & K. A. Lye. 1983. Sedges and rushes of East Africa. (Sedge EAfr) 165.
Hara, H. et al. 1978–1982. An enumeration of the flowering plants of Nepal. (L Nepal)
Harden, G. J., ed. 1990–1993. Flora of New South Wales. (F NSWales)
Hedberg, I. & S. Edwards. 1990–. Flora of Ethiopia. (F Ethiop)
Hnatiuk, R. J. 1990. Census of Australian vascular plants. Australian Flora and Fauna Series No. 11. (L Aust)
Holm, L. et al. 1979. A geographical atlas of world weeds. (Atlas WWeed)
Horvat, M. L. 1941. A revision of the subgenus Mariscus found in the United States. Catholic Univ. Amer., Biol. Ser. 33: 1147.
Jørgensen, P. M. & S. León-Yánez, eds. 1999. Catalogue of the vascular plants of Ecuador. Monogr. Syst. Bot. Missouri Bot. Gard. 75. (L Ecuador)
Jessop, J. P. & H. R. Toelken, eds. 1986. Flora of South Australia, ed. 4. (F SAust)
Keay, R. W. J. & F. N. Hepper. 1953–1972. Flora of west tropical Africa, ed. 2. (F WT Afr)
Komarov, V. L. et al., eds. 1934–1964. Flora SSSR. (F USSR)
Mackenzie, K. K. 1931-1935. Cyperaceae [in part]. In: N. L. Britton et al., eds. 1905+. North American Floraâ¦. 47+ vols. New York. Vol. 18, parts 1-7, pp. 1-478.
Marcks, B. G. 1972. Population Studies of North American Cyperus Section Laxiglumi (Cyperaceae). Ph.D. dissertation. University of Wisconsin.
Marcks, B. G. 1974. Preliminary reports on the flora of Wisconsin, no. 66. Cyperaceae II Sedge family II. The genus Cyperusthe umbrella sedges. Trans. Wisconsin Acad. Sci. 62: 261284.
McGivney, M. V. 1938. A revision of the subgenus Eucyperus found in the United States. Catholic Univ. Amer., Biol. Ser. 26: 174.
Mouterde, P. 1966–. Nouvelle flore du Liban et de la Syrie. (F Liban)
Rechinger, K. H., ed. 1963–. Flora iranica. (F Iran)
Rye, B. L. 1997. Nuytsia 11:405.
Simpson, D. A. and C. A. Inglis. 2001. Cyperaceae of economic, ethnobotanical and horticultural importance: A checklist. Kew Bull. 56: 257-360.
Smith, A. C. 1979–1991. Flora vitiensis nova. (F Viti)
Smitinand, T. & K. Larsen, eds. 1970–. Flora of Thailand. (F Thailand)
Stanley, T. D. & E. M. Ross. 1983–1989. Flora of south-eastern Queensland. (F SE Queensl)
Steenis, C. G. G. J. van, ed. 1948–. Flora malesiana. (F Males)
Svenson, H. K. 1957. Cyperaceae. Tribe 2, Scirpeae. In: N. L. Britton et al., eds. 1905+. North American Flora.... 47+ vols. New York. Vol. 18, pp. 505-556.
Thulin, M., ed. 1993–. Flora of Somalia. (F Somalia)
Townsend, C. C. & E. Guest. 1966–. Flora of Iraq. (F Iraq)
Tucker, G. C. 1983. The taxonomy of Cyperus (Cyperaceae) in Costa Rica and Panama. Syst. Bot. Mongr. 2: 185.
Tucker, G. C. 1987. The genera of Cyperaceae in the southeastern United States. J. Arnold Arbor. 68: 361-445.
Tucker, G. C. 1994. A revision of the Mexican species of Cyperus L. (Cyperaceae). Syst. Bot. Monogr. 43: 1214.
Tucker, G. C. 1994. Revision of the Mexican species of Cyperus (Cyperaceae). Syst. Bot. Monogr. 43:50.
Tucker, G. C. and R. McVaugh. 1993. Cyperus. In: R. McVaugh and W. R. Anderson, eds. 1974+. Flora Novo-Galiciana: A Descriptive Account of the Vascular Plants of Western Mexico. 8+ vols. Ann Arbor. Vol. 3, pp. 270344.
Tutin, T. G. et al., eds. 1964–1980. Flora europaea. (F Eur)
Wood, J. R. I. 1997. A handbook of the flora of Yemen. (F Yemen)
Zohary, M. & N. Feinbrun-Dothan. 1966–. Flora palaestina. (F Palest)
Peter W. Ball, A. A. Reznicek, David F. Murray "Cyperaceae". in Flora of North America Vol. 23 Page 3, 4, 192, 243, 252. Oxford University Press. Online at EFloras.org.
Gordon C. Tucker, Brian G. Marcks & J. Richard Carter "Cyperus". in Flora of North America Vol. 23 Page 7, 141, 154, 162, 163, 164, 168, 170, 184,. Oxford University Press. Online at EFloras.org.