For the 21,541 species in the Class Osteichthyes (Bony Fishes), we average 36.49 observations each in our database; for the Great Lakes Longnose Dace, we have 1,282 observations. Compared to other species in this Class, this species is moderately common.
A two-sample t-test can be used to determine whether the trend in observations of the Great Lakes Longnose Dace is the same as the trend in observations of Osteichthyes. Is this species just as common, as a proportion of all observations, as it once was? The answer is no, changes in observation rate of this species significantly differ from changes in observation rate of its Class. (t=12.794, p<0.001)
How do observation rates of the Great Lakes Longnose Dace differ from those of Osteichthyes? To answer this, we examined the percentage of observerations for Osteichthyes that were observations of the Great Lakes Longnose Dace each year. We then correlated this percentage with observation year. If observations of the Great Lakes Longnose Dace are becoming more common relative to other species of Osteichthyes, the correlation should be positive, but if it is becoming less common, the correlation should be negative. In fact, the correlation is negative (r=-.55), with a negative slope (m = -.007), suggesting that the Great Lakes Longnose Dace may be in decline relative to other species of Osteichthyes. This correlation is statistically significant. (F = 50.57, p<.05)
The scatter chart to the right shows the percentage of all observations for Osteichthyes each year that were observations of the Great Lakes Longnose Dace.
Distribution: North America (northern Canada to southern Mexico), Africa, and Eurasia.Pharynx with 1-3 rows of teeth, each row with a maximum of 8 teeth. Usually thin lips, plicae or papillae absent; mouth sometimes suckerlike (Garra and Labeo). With or without barbels. Premaxilla usually borders the upper
jaw making the maxilla entirely or almost entirely excluded from the gape. Usually protrusible upper jaw. Dorsal fin with spinelike rays in some. Primitive number of chromosomes 2n=50, some with 48; polyploidy exists. Maximum length at least 2.5 m to probably 3 m in Catlocarpio siamensis; many species less than 5 cm. Mainly non-guarders, but in some species males build nests and/or protect the eggs.
The family Cyprinidae belongs to the ClassActinopterygii (ray-finned fishes) and the Order Cypriniformes. It contains 210 genera and 2010 species. It may be found in Brackish, and Freshwater environments and is primarily Primaryfreshwater. Many members of this family are used in the aquarium trade. Reproductively, most members of this family are nonguarders. The main mode of swimming of adultfish in this family is subcarangiform. Compared with other fish, the activity level of this family tends to be normal. Members of this family have been dated back to the Eoceneepoch of the Tertiaryperiod. This family may be found from 70° n to 34° s and 150° w to 170° e. Etymology of this family name: Greek, kyprinos = goldfish.
Species Rhinichthys cataractae:
Body: Mouth and Snout: Mouth inferior without any teeth. Inconspicuous barbels at corners of the mouth. Thick fleshylips with frenum connecting snout with lip. Snout greatly overhangs mouth. Body Pattern: Sides brown, dark olive, or dark gray with darker blotches and mottling often coalescing into an irregularlateral stripe anteriorly. Cream, silvery or yellow-white belly.Finspigmented. Body Shape: Fusiform and elongate, almost round in cross-section with ventral area slightly dorso-ventrally flattened. Typical adult size is 75-100 mm TL (3-4 in), with a maximum of about 140 mm (5.5 in).
Distinguishing characteristics: Inferior mouth with fleshy lips and inconspicuous barbels at the corners. Frenum connection upper lip to snout. Compaired to blacknose dace, snout greatly overhangs mouth and body is less deep and more elongated. 61-75 cycloid lateral scales. About 54 scalerows around body. See also similar species information.
Breeding adults: Males have small tubercles on head, scales, and pectoral. Both sexes get salmon, orange, or yellowish pigment around mouth, cheek, base of pectoral, pelvic, and caudal fin.
Juveniles: Similar to adults, but typically lateral stripe more pronouced, caudal spot present.
North America: widely occurs from coast to coast of north-central North America: in the east along the mountains to Virginia; in the Mississippi drainage south to Iowa; in the western basin south to northern Mexico; reported from northeastern Nevada; in the inshore waters in all the Great Lakes[1].
Inhabit rubble and gravelriffles (sometimes runs and pools) of fast creeks and small to medium rivers; also in rocky shores of lakes[2]. Young up to 4 months are pelagic[3].
All suckers at the juvenile stage (Catostomidae: Catostomus, Hypentelium, Minytrema, Moxostoma) are moderately similar and all criteria as described for the white sucker apply.
Banks, R. C., R. W. McDiarmid, A. L. Gardner, and W. C. Starnes 2003. Checklist of Vertebrates of the United States, the U.S. Territories, and Canada.
Eschmeyer, William N., ed. 1998. Catalog of Fishes. Special Publication of the Center for Biodiversity Research and Information, no. 1, vol 1-3. California Academy of Sciences. San Francisco, California, USA. 2905. ISBN: 0-940228-47-5.
International Union for Conservation of Nature and Natural Resources (IUCN) (1990). 1990 IUCN red list of threatened animals. IUCN, Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, U.K. 288 p.
Page, L.M. and B.M. Burr (1991). A field guide to freshwater fishes of North America north of Mexico. Houghton Mifflin Company, Boston. 432 p.
Robins, Richard C., Reeve M. Bailey, Carl E. Bond, James R. Brooker, Ernest A. Lachner, et al. 1980. A List of Common and Scientific Names of Fishes from the United States and Canada, Fourth Edition. American Fisheries Society Special Publication, no. 12. American Fisheries Society. Bethesda, Maryland, USA. 174.
Scott, W.B. and E.J. Crossman (1973). Freshwater fishes of Canada. Bull. Fish. Res. Board Can. 184:1-966.
Brands, S.J. (comp.) 1989-2006. Systema Naturae 2000. The Taxonomicon. Universal Taxonomic Services, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. Accessed November 2, 2006.
Brands, S.J. (comp.) 1989-2007. Systema Naturae 2000. The Taxonomicon. Universal Taxonomic Services, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. Accessed March 20, 2007.
Global Biodiversity Information Facility. Accessed March 18, 2008. http://www.gbif.org Mediated distribution data from provider.
Lyons, John. WiscFish.org University of Wisconsin, Center for Limnology, Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources, University of Wisconsin Sea Grant. Provided
photos, physical description, and table comparing similar species.