Overview
|
Endangered |
|
Interesting Facts
Common Names
Click on the language to view common names.
Common Names in Dutch:
Varkenshert, Zwijnshert
Common Names in English:
Hog Deer, Indochinese Hog Deer, Thai Hog Deer
Common Names in French:
Cerf-cochon, Cerf Des Marais, Cerf-cochon D'Indochine
Common Names in Spanish:
Ciervo Porquerizo De Indochina
Description
Habitat
Biome: Terrestrial ; Freshwater [1].
Ecology:
Hog
Deer have usually been reported from habitat
consisting of wet
or moist tall grasslands, often associated with medium- to large-sized
rivers
(Bhowmik et al.
1999; Biswas and Mathur 2000; Biswas
2004), and appears to reach its highest densities in floodplain
grasslands
(Seidensticker 1976; Dhungel and OGara 1991; Karanth and Nichols
2000; Odden et al. 2005). It avoids closed-canopy forest
,
but will use coastal grasslands (e.g.
Peacock 1933). Johnsingh et
al. (2004) considered Hog Deer to be an obligate
grassland species
in the Terai Arc Landscape of India, and studies in India and Nepal
have show a preference for grasslands dominated by Imperata cylindrical
(Biswas 2004 and references
therein). Similar alluvial
floodplain
grassland seems to be used in Thailand and Indochina (Maxwell et
al. 2007; Clark
undated; R.J. Timmins pers. comm.
2006). In
Bardia National Park, measured densities were much higher in the
floodplain association than in the riverine
association, and no Hog
Deer were found in adjacent
Sal Shorea robusta forest at
all (Odden et al. 2005). The remnant population in Bangladesh
is located in grassy, lightly wooded, hill
country (Khan 2004). Similar
habitats are used by Hog Deer in India, where they are seem to be
marginal habitats
supporting only low-density populations (Anwaruddin
Choudhury pers. comm.
2006): they may historically have been primarily
sink populations. The reintroduced
semi-wild populations in Thailand
occupy a variety of habitats for which there is no evidence of use
by wild populations
in Thailand, Lao PDR, Viet Nam or Cambodia. One
of the few detailed historical accounts of an abundant population
in South-east Asia was from extensive tall floodplain grasslands
in the Dong Nai catchment
, Viet Nam (Clark undated). Hog Deer is
a primarily a grazer
of young grasses, particularly Imperata
cylindrica and Saccharum spp.
; it also takes herbs,
flowers, fruits, and browse
(young leaves and shoots
of shrubs
) (Bhowmik
et al. 1999; Dhungel and OGara 1991; Bisawas 2004; Wegge
et al. 2006). It is much more a grazer and less a browser
than is the Sambar Rusa unicolor. Introduced
animals occur in scrub
and cinnamon gardens in Sri Lanka, where they cause considerable
damage to home
crops
(McCarthy and Dissanayake 1992).
Where
undisturbed, Hog Deer tend to be crepuscular, with significant day-time
activity and some at night, especially in the hot and wet seasons
(Dhungel and OGara 1991). In some areas it seems to have become
more nocturnal
and solitary (e.g. Cambodia; R.J. Timmins pers. comm.
2008), presumably through hunting pressure
. The main social group
is a female and fawn. When more Hog Deer are together, they do not
form a strong
"unit
", fleeing when flushed in different directions
rather than as one. In Chitwan, aggregations of up to 20 animals
have been observed feeding on new shoots following fire (Dhungel
and OGara 1991). In Kaziranga, aggregations of 4080 animals are
frequently seen on grazing grounds
created by Great Indian Rhinoceros
Rhinoceros unicornis and/or short grasslands near large water bodies
(N.S. Kumar pers. comm. 2008, based on observations in 1996). Home
ranges
vary widely in size, but average about 570 ha, depending
on how the range is defined (Dhungel and OGara 1991; Odden et
al. 2005). In Chitwan, Hog Deer are essentially sedentary
(Dhungel
and OGara (1991), but in cultivated landscapes (Sri Lanka) movements
are reported to be influenced by agricultural seasons (McCarthy and
Dissanayake 1992). They move into higher-lying grasslands in response
to monsoon flooding in India, Myanmar and presumably throughout their
range (Peacock 1933; Q. Qureshi pers. comm. 1995). The rut
is during
SeptemberOctober in Nepal and India and (presumably based on captives)
during SeptemberFebruary in China. 12 fawns are born during AprilMay
in Nepal and during AprilOctober in China. Gestation period
is 220230
days (Dhungel and OGara 1991; Sheng and Ohtaishi 1993). Fawns wean
at six months, reaching sexual maturity at 812 months. The maximum
recorded life span is 20 years.[1].
List of Habitats:
- 2 Savanna
- 2.2 Savanna - Moist
- 3 Shrubland
- 3.6 Shrubland - Subtropical/Tropical Moist
- 4 Grassland
- 4.6 Grassland - Subtropical/Tropical Seasonally Wet/Flooded
- 5 Wetlands (inland)
- 5.4 Wetlands (inland) - Bogs , Marshes, Swamps , Fens , Peatlands
- 5.6 Wetlands (inland) - Seasonal/Intermittent Freshwater Lakes (over 8ha)
- 5.7 Wetlands (inland) - Permanent Freshwater Marshes/Pools (under 8ha)
- 15 Artificial/Aquatic & Marine
- 15.8 Artificial/Aquatic - Seasonally Flooded Agricultural Land [more info]
Taxonomy
- Domain:
Eukaryota
(
)
- Whittaker & Margulis,1978
- eukaryotes
- Kingdom:
Animalia
(
)
- C. Linnaeus, 1758
- animals
- Subkingdom:
Bilateria
(
)
- (Hatschek, 1888) Cavalier-Smith, 1983
- Branch:
Deuterostomia
(
)
- Grobben, 1908
- Infrakingdom:
Chordonia
(
)
- (Haeckel, 1874) Cavalier-Smith, 1998
- Phylum:
Chordata
(
)
- Bateson, 1885
- Chordates
- Subphylum:
Vertebrata
(
)
- Cuvier, 1812
- Infraphylum:
Gnathostomata
(
)
- auct.
- Jawed Vertebrates
- Superclass:
Tetrapoda
(
)
- Goodrich, 1930
- Class:
Mammalia
(
)
- C. Linnaeus, 1758
- Subclass:
Theriiformes
(
)
- (Rowe, 1988) M.C. McKenna & S.K. Bell, 1997
- Infraclass:
Holotheria
(
)
- (Wible et al., 1995) M.C. McKenna & S.K. Bell, 1997
- Superlegion:
Trechnotheria
(
)
- McKenna, 1975
- Legion:
Cladotheria
(
)
- McKenna, 1975
- Sublegion:
Zatheria
(
)
- McKenna, 1975
- Infralegion:
Tribosphenida
(
)
- (McKenna, 1975) M.C. McKenna & S.K. Bell, 1997
- Supercohort:
Theria
(
)
- (Parker & Haswell, 1897) M.C. McKenna & S.K. Bell, 1997
- Cohort:
Placentalia
(
)
- (Owen, 1837) M.C. McKenna & S.K. Bell, 1997
- Magnorder:
Epitheria
(
)
- (Mckenna, 1975) M.c. Mckenna & S.k. Bell, 1997
- Superorder:
Preptotheria
(
)
- (McKenna, 1975) McKenna, in Stucky & McKenna, in Benton, ed., 1993
- Grandorder:
Ungulata
(
)
- (C. Linnaeus, 1766) McKenna, 1975
- Mirorder:
Eparctocyona
(
)
- McKenna, 1975
- Order:
Cetartiodactyla
(
)
- Owen, 1848
- Suborder:
Ruminantia
(
)
- Scopoli, 1777
- Series:
-
Peacock, E. H. 1933. A Game
(
)
- Superfamily:
Cervoidea
(
)
- (Goldfuss, 1820) Hay, 1930
- Superfamily:
Cervoidea
(
- Suborder:
Ruminantia
(
- Order:
Cetartiodactyla
(
- Mirorder:
Eparctocyona
(
- Grandorder:
Ungulata
(
- Superorder:
Preptotheria
(
- Magnorder:
Epitheria
(
- Cohort:
Placentalia
(
- Supercohort:
Theria
(
- Infralegion:
Tribosphenida
(
- Sublegion:
Zatheria
(
- Legion:
Cladotheria
(
- Superlegion:
Trechnotheria
(
- Infraclass:
Holotheria
(
- Subclass:
Theriiformes
(
- Class:
Mammalia
(
- Superclass:
Tetrapoda
(
- Infraphylum:
Gnathostomata
(
- Subphylum:
Vertebrata
(
- Phylum:
Chordata
(
- Infrakingdom:
Chordonia
(
- Branch:
Deuterostomia
(
- Subkingdom:
Bilateria
(
- Kingdom:
Animalia
(
Notes
Name
Status: Accepted Name
.
Last scrutiny: 22-Apr-2004
Current
research suggests that Hog
Deer should be included
within
the genus Hyelaphus, together with calamianensis
and kuhlii (Meijaard and Groves 2004; Pitra et al.
2004); it is also sometimes listed under Cervus porcinus.
Two subspecies
are generally recognized, the nominate
and A.
p. annamiticus (type
locality
in Viet Nam), although there has
been no recent re-evaluation, and the relative historical distributions
of these subspecies and nature of contact between them, if any, remain
unclear (Maxwell et al. 2007). South Asian and Myanmar populations
appear to be spotted when young, while those in southern Viet Nam
and Kratie, Cambodia, appear to lack spotting when young (Peacock
1933; Clark
undated; R.J. Timmins pers. comm.
2008 based on WWF Cambodia
unpublished data
and specimens in the AMNH; see also Maxwell et
al. 2007).[1].
Similar Species
Members of the genus Axis
ZipcodeZoo has pages for 5 species and subspecies in this genus:
A. axis (Spotted Deer) · A. calamianensis (Calamian Hog Deer) · A. kuhlii (Bawean Hog Deer) · A. porcinus (Indochinese Hog Deer) · A. porcinus annamiticus (Indochinese Hog Deer)
More Info
- Search for Pictures: images.google.com
- Search for Scholarly Articles: Google Scholar
- Search using Scientific Name and Vernacular Names: All the Web | AltaVista Canada | AltaVista | Excite | Google | HotBot | Lycos
- Search using Specialized Databases: GenBank | Medline | Scirus | CISTI/CAL | Agricola Periodicals | Agricola Books
Further Reading
- Bezuijen, M. R., Timmins, R. and Seng, T. (eds). In press. Biological surveys of the Mekong River between Kratie and Stung Treng Towns, northeast Cambodia, 2006-2007. WWF Greater Mekong Programme, Cambodia Fisheries Administration and Cambodia Forestry Administration, Phnom Penh.
- Bhowmik, M. K. 2002. The causes of decline of hog deer (Axis porcinus) in protected areas of Himalayan West Bengal. Zoos' Print Journal 17(8): 858-860.
- Bhowmik, M. K., Chakraborty, T. and Raha, A. K. 1999. The habitat and food habits of hog deer (Axis porcinus) in protected areas of sub-Himalayan West Bengal. Tiger Paper 26(2): 25-27.
- Biswas, T, Mathur, V. B. and Sawarkar, V. B. 2002. Status of Hog Deer (Axis porcinus) in India. Wildlife Institute of India, Dehradun, India.
- Biswas, T. 1999. Habitat utilization by Hog Deer (Axis Porcinus) in relation to other sympatric species at Jaldapara Wildlife Sanctuary. Saurashtra University.
- Biswas, T. 2004. Hog Deer (Axis porcinus Zimmerman, 1780). ENVIS Bulletin (Wildlife Institute of India, Dehra Dun) 7: 6178.
- Biswas, T. and Mathur, V. B. 2000. A review of the present conservation scenario of Hog deer (Axis porcinus) in its native range. Indian Forester 126(10): 1068-1084.
- Biswas, T. and Singh, S. 2002. Status and distribution of Hog Deer (Axis porcinus) in the duars - analyzing a changing landscape. Forestry and Ecology Division, Indian Institute of Remote Sensing.
- Clark, J. C. 1936. My Indo-China hunt [typewritten unbound account of the 1936 Fleischmann-Clark, American Museum, Indo-China Expedition]. New York, USA.
- Dang, H. H., Dao, D. V. T., Cao, V. S., Pham, T. A. and Hoang, M. K. 1994. Checklist of mammals in Vietnam. Publishing House, Hanoi, Vietnam.
- Deer Specialist Group. For more information, see the Specialist Group website
- Dhungel, S. K. and O'Gara, B. W. 1991. Ecology of the hog deer in Royal Chitwan National Park, Nepal. Wildlife Monographs 119: 1-40.
- Dinerstein, E. 1979. An ecological survey of the Royal Karnali Bardia Wildlife Reserve, Nepal 2. Habitat and animal interactions. Biological Conservation 16(4): 265-300.
- Duckworth, J. W., Salter, R. E. and Khounbline, K. 1999. Wildlife in Lao PDR: 1999 Status Report. IUCN, Vientiane, Laos.
- Dumas, C. 1944. La faune sauvage du Cambodge. Editions Aymonier, Phnom Penh.
- Evans, G. H. 1902. Notes on the Hog Deer in Burma. Journal of the Bombay Natural History Society 14: 310-315.
- Grubb, P. 2005. Artiodactyla. In: D. E. Wilson and D. M. Reeder (eds), Mammal Species of the World. A Taxonomic and Geographic Reference (3rd ed), pp. 637-722. Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, USA.
- Humphrey, S. R. and Bain, J. R. 1990. Endangered mammals of Thailand. Sandhill Crane Press Incorporated, Gainsville, Florida, USA.
- Johnsingh, A. J. T., Qureshi, Q., Goyal, S. P., Rawat, G. S., Ramesh, K., David, A., Rajapandian, K. and Prasad, S. 2004. Conservation Status of Tiger and Associated Species in the Terai Arc Landscape, India.
- Karanth, K. U. and Nichols, J. D. 2000. Ecological status and conservation of tigers in India. Centre for Wildlife Studies, Bangalore, India.
- Khan, M. M. H. 2004. A report on the existence of wild Hog Deers in Bangladesh. Bangladesh Journal of Zoology 32: 111112.
- Kumar, H., Mathur, P. K., Lehmkuhl, J. F., Khati, D. S., Dr., R. and Longwah, W. 2002. Management of forests for biological diversity and forests productivity: a new perspective, vol. VI: Terai Conservation Area (TCA). WII-USDA Forest Service Collaborative Project Report, Wildlife Institute of India, Dehra Dun, India.
- Lehmkuhl, J. F. 1994. A classification of subtropical riverine grassland and forest in Chitwan National Park, Nepal. Vegetatio 111: 29-43.
- Lekagul, B. and Mcneely, J. A. 1988. Mammals of Thailand. White Lotus Press, Bangkok, Thailand.
- Lynam, A. J. 2003. A National Tiger Action Plan for the Union of Myanmar. Myanmar Forest Department, Ministry of Forestry, Yangon, Myanmar.
- Madhusudan, M. D. 2004. Recovery of wild large herbivores following livestock decline in a tropical Indian wildlife reserve. Journal of Applied Ecology 41: 858869.
- Maxwell, A., Chea Nareth, Duong Kong, Timmins, R. and Duckworth, J. W. 2007. Hog Deer (Axis porcinus) confirmed in the wild in eastern Cambodia. Natural History Bulletin of the Siam Society 54: 227237.
- McCarthy, A. J. and Dissanayake, S. 1992. Status of the hog deer (Axis porcinus) in Sri Lanka. Report to Department of Wildlife Conservation, Colombo. Department of Wildlife Conservation.
- McCarthy, A. J., Dissanayake, S. B. 1994. Status of the hog deer in Sri Lanka. Oryx 28(1): 62-66.
- Meijaard, I. and Groves, C. P. 2004. Morphometrical relationships between South-east Asian deer (Cervidae, tribe Cervini): evolutionary and biogeographic implications. Journal of Zoology (London) 263: 179-196.
- Milton, O., Estes, R. D. and Kimlai, H. Z. 1964. Burma Wildlife Survey Report on the Pidaung Wildlife Sanctuary. Burmese Forester 14: 54-68.
- Moe, S. R. 1995. Distribution and Movement Pattern of Deer in Response to Food Quality and Manipulation of Grassy Habitat: A Case Study With Emphasis On Axis Deer (Axis axis) in Lowland Nepal. Ph.D. Thesis, Norges Landbrukshogskole.
- Moore, G. and Mayze, R. 1990. The hog deer. Australian Deer Research Foundation, Croydon, Australia.
- Morten Odden and Per Wegge. 2006. Predicting spacing behavior and mating systems of solitary cervids: A study of hog deer and Indian muntjac. Department of Ecology and Natural Resource Management.
- Odden, M., Wegge, P. and Storaas, T. 2005. Hog deer Axis porcinus need threatened tallgrass floodplains: a study of habitat selection in lowland Nepal. Animal Conservation 8: 99104.
- Ohtaishi, N. and Gao, Y. T. 1990. A review of the distribution of all species of deer (Tragulidae, Moschidae and Cervidae) in China. Mammal Review 20(2-3): 125-144.
- Osgood, W. H. 1932. Mammals of the Kelley-Roosevelts and Delacour Asiatic expeditions. Field Museum of Natural History, Zoology Series 18(10): 193-339.
- Peacock, E. H. 1933. A Game-Book for Burma and Adjoining Territories. Witherby, London, UK.
- Peet, N. B., Watkinson, A. R., Bell, D. J. and Kattel, B. J. 1999. Plant diversity in the threatened subtropical grasslands of Nepal. Biological Conservation 88: 193-206.
- Peter Grubb: Status: CITES - Appendix I as Cervus (= Axis) porcinus annamiticus; U.S. ESA - Endangered as Axis (= Cervus) porcinus annamiticus
- Pitra, C., Fickel, J., Meijaard, E. and Groves, C. 2004. Evolution and phylogeny of old world deer. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 33: 880-895.
- Rao, M., Rabinowitz, A. R. and Khaing, S. T. 2002. Status review of the protected-area system in Myanmar, with recommendations for conservation planning. Conservation Biology 16(2): 360.
- Ratajszczak, R. 1991. The distribution and status of deer in Vietnam.
- Roberts, T. J. 1977. The Mammals of Pakistan. Ernest Benn, London, UK.
- Salter, R. E. 1984. Integrated development of the Sundarbans, Bangladesh: status and utilization of wildlife. FAO, Rome, Italy.
- Seidensticker, J. 1976. Ungulate populations in Chitawan valley, Nepal. Biological Conservation 10: 183-210.
- Sheng, H. I. and Ohtaishi, N. 1993. The status of deer in China. In: N. Ohtaishi and H. I. Sheng (eds), Deer of China: Biology and Management, pp. 8. Elsevier, Oxford, UK.
- Smith, A. and Xie, Y. 2008. The Mammals of China. Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey.
- Tandon, V. 1989. Conservation status of hog deer Cervus porcinus in India and adjacent areas. IUCN/SSC Deer Specialist Group Newsletter 7.
- Than Zaw, Saw Htun, Saw Htoo Tha Po, Myint Maung, Lynam, A. J., Kyaw Thinn Latt & Duckworth, J. W. 2008. Status and distribution of small carnivores in Myanmar. Small Carnivore Conservation 38: 228.
- Timmins, R. J. and Duckworth, J. W. 2000. Priorities for mammal conservation in the ROA: desk study for the Ecoregion-based conservation in the forests of the lower Mekong, biological assessment workshop. WWF Indochina Programme, Phnom Penh, Cambodia.
- Tordoff, A. W., Timmins, R. J., Maxwell, A., Huy Keavuth, Lic Vuthy and Khou Eang Hourt (eds). 2005. Biological assessment of the Lower Mekong Dry Forests Ecoregion. pp. 192 pp.. WWF Greater Mekong Programme., Phnom Penh, Cambodia.
- Whale, R. 1996. Surveying hog deer in Pakistan. Deer 10(1): 45.
- Whitehead, K. G. 1993. The Whitehead Encyclopedia of Deer. Voyageur Press, Inc, Stillwater, MN, USA.
- Wilson, Don E., and DeeAnn M. Reeder, eds. 1993. Mammal Species of the World: A Taxonomic and Geographic Reference, 2nd ed., 3rd printing. Smithsonian Institution Press. Washington, DC, USA. xviii + 1207. ISBN: 1-56098-217-9.
- Wilson, Don E., and F. Russell Cole 2000. Common Names of Mammals of the World. Smithsonian Institution Press. Washington, DC, USA. xiv + 204. ISBN: 1-56098-383-3.
- World Conservation Monitoring Centre. 1992. Status of threatened deer within protected areas: a contribution to the IUCN/SSC Action Plan. World Conservation Monitoring Centre, Cambridge, UK.
Notes
Contributors
- Bisby, F.A., Y.R. Roskov, M.A. Ruggiero, T.M. Orrell, L.E. Paglinawan, P.W. Brewer, N. Bailly, J. van Hertum, eds (2007). Species 2000 & ITIS Catalogue of Life: 2007 Annual Checklist. Species 2000: Reading, U.K.
- Brands, S.J. (comp.) 1989-present. The Taxonomicon. Universal Taxonomic Services, Zwaag, The Netherlands. Accessed January 9, 2012.
- Deer Specialist Group 1996. Axis porcinus ssp. annamiticus. In: IUCN 2004. 2004 IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. www.redlist.org . Downloaded on 30 January 2005.
- Global Biodiversity Information Facility. Accessed March 03, 2008. http://www.gbif.org Mediated distribution data from provider.
- IUCN 2012. IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. Version 2011.2. . Downloaded on January 28, 2012.
- Ruggiero M., Gordon D., Bailly N., Kirk P., Nicolson D. (2011). The Catalogue of Life Taxonomic Classification, Edition 2, Part A. In: Species 2000 & ITIS Catalogue of Life: 2011 Annual Checklist (Bisby F.A., Roskov Y.R., Orrell T.M., Nicolson D., Paglinawan L.E., Bailly N., Kirk P.M., Bourgoin T., Baillargeon G., Ouvrard D., eds). DVD; Species 2000: Reading, UK.
- Timmins, R.J., Duckworth, J.W., Samba Kumar, N., Anwarul Islam, Md., Sagar Baral, H., Long, B. & Maxwell, A. 2008. Axis porcinus. In: IUCN 2011. IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. Version 2011.2. <www.iucnredlist.org>. Downloadedon 30January2012.
Data Sources
Accessed through GBIF Data Portal March 03, 2008:
- OZCAM (Online Zoological Collections of Australian Museums) Provider: Online Zoological Collections of Australian Museums
Identifiers
- Biodiversity Heritage Library NamebankID: 1
- Catalogue of Life Accepted Name Code: ITS-625044
- Integrated Taxonomic Information System (ITIS) Taxonomic Serial Number (TSN): 625044
- IUCN ID: 193755
- Zipcode Zoo Species Identifier: 2381
Footnotes
- Timmins, R.J., Duckworth, J.W., Samba Kumar, N., Anwarul Islam, Md., Sagar Baral, H., Long, B. & Maxwell, A. 2008. Axis porcinus. In: IUCN 2011. IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. Version 2011.2. <www.iucnredlist.org>. Downloaded on 30 January 2012. [back]
